 |
|
 |
|
Published Articles
Please note: The following
information is available in Adobe Acrobat (version 6.0) Published by Office of Research and Statistics (ORS) staff: Is
Prison Sexual Offending Behavior Indicative of Community Risk? The
Colorado Sex Offender Risk Scale The
Containment Approach to Managing Sex Offenders The
Containment Approach: An Aggresive Strategy for the Community Management
of Adult Sex Offenders The
Impact of Polygraphy on Admissions of Victims and Offenders in Adult
Sexual Offenders The
Value of the Post-Conviction Polygraph: The Importance of Sanctions Prison
Rape: What We Know Today. Sex
Offender Containment: Use of Post Conviction Polygraph Sex
offender Polygraph Testing in the United States: Trends and Controversies
. (1) Heil, P., Harrison, L., English, & K., Alhmeyer, S. (2009). Is Prison Sexual Offending Behavior Indicative of Community Risk? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36 (9), 892-908. (2) English, K. , Retzlaff, P. , & Kleinsasser, D. (2002). The Colorado Sex Offender Risk Scale. Journal of Child Abuse, 11, 77-96. (3) English, K. (2004). The containment approach to managing sex offenders. Seton Hall Law Review, 34, 1255-1272. (4) English, K. (1998). The containment approach: An aggressive strategy for the community management of adult sex offenders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4 (1/2), 218-235. (5) Ahlmeyer, S., Heil, P., McKee, B., & English, K. (2000). The impact of polygraphy on admissions of victims and offenses in adult sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12(2), 123-138. (6) Cooley-Towell, S., Pasini-Hill, D., & Patrick, D. (2000). The value of the post-conviction polygraph: The importance of sanctions. Polygraph, 29(1), 6-19. (7) English, K., & Heil, P. (2005). Prison Rape: What We Know Today. Corrections Compendium, 30(5), 1-5 and 42-44. (8) English, K., Jones, L. , Patrick, D., & Pasini-Hill, D. (2003). Sexual offender containment: Use of the post conviction polygraph. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. (9) Heil, P., &
English, K. (2009). Sex offender polygraph testing in the United
States: Trend and controversies. The use of the polygraph in
assessing, treating, and supervision sex offenders: A practioners
guide (pp. 181-216). United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
Other Important Resources for ORS website visitors: Grotpeter, J.K., & Elliot, D.S. (2002).
Violent sexual offending. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Center
for the Study and Prevention of Violence, Institute of Behavioral
Science.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
file
format. This file format is read-only and print-only (not editable).
You will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader to download these files.
The Acrobat Reader is available FREE OF CHARGE at 
